50 Shades of White, PAP-Govt’s House Needs Cleaning

Khaw's words while leading the coordinated attacking on WP in Parliament.

Khaw’s words while leading the coordinated attack on WP in Parliament.

There has been a firestorm in Parliament this past week with the ruling party lashing out at the Workers Party with exceptional venom and shockingly slanderous accusations. I am not going to add to the debate over the AHPETC town council matter as this has been covered in-depth online and it has been reported extensively by the mainstream media which devoted reams of pages to this over several days.

Instead, I am wondering about the sense of perspective over AHPETC, or rather the loss of perspective, by the ruling party and the MSM for them to have devoted so much time, energy, public resources and news space to it when there are many other bigger issues of concern to the citizens.

Let’s start with the 2013/2014 report by the Auditor-General (AGO) on the transgressions by the government. The contents list of this 64-page report was an eye-opener as it listed the numerous financial lapses and irregularities found to have been committed by EVERY Ministry in FY2013/2014.

The puzzling question is – Why didn’t the Ministers and MPs openly address in Parliament some of the major lapses (some repeated) committed by their agencies if they truly care about integrity, transparency and doing what is in the best interest of Singaporeans? Instead, the PAP MPS and several heavyweight Ministers like Khaw Boon Wan and Shanmugam spent a great deal of the entire Parliament time this past week harping on ONE lapse by the Workers Party – the management of AHPETC. Is it because the ruling party is gearing up for the looming General Elections which may take place this year?

Even though there were lapses in the management of AHPETC, one would have expected the MPs to at least allocate balanced time to the matter while spending precious Parliament time and resources debating and addressing other areas of great concern. This is what tax-payers expect their MPs to do and not to waste resources bombarding the opposition in Parliament in an astoundingly undignified manner.

It was shocking indeed to hear Khaw Boon Wan use the example of  Japanese senior management who would resign and even commit hara-kiri (suicide) over wrongdoings. I doubt he was actually asking the WP MPs to kill themselves over AHPETC but Khaw was certainly playing to the gallery to exaggerate and  sensationalise the lapses committed by WP during its learning curve of managing its first GRC.

Those who live in glass houses should be sure their homes are clean of filth before they lob accusations at others for not doing proper housekeeping.  In the 2013/2014 report by the AGO, irregularities were found in various agencies under the Ministry of National Development headed by Minister Khaw who has been spearheading the Parliamentary attacks on WP.

The report said the National Parks Board’s transgressions included creating and backdating some documents relating to the development of Gardens by the Bay to give the impression that they existed at the time when the relevant transactions took place. The AGO said “creating and backdating documents to satisfy audit queries is a serious irregularity. It also casts doubts on the authenticity of other documents and information provided to AGO.”

Although MND conducted an inquiry into this, shouldn’t it still account openly to the people as to how such a lapse could have happened in the name of transparency and assure the public that such lapses will not happen again to any agency under its control? Instead it appears that its big chief has been busy expending energy on pontificating about his righteousness and taking WP to task over AHPETC.

Over at the the Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority (AVA). which is also under the MND, the AGO found had grossly underutilized land, buildings and facilities at several places which is to quote the AGO “tantamount to a waste of public resources”. As an example, AGO found that of the 41 buildings at the Sembawang site, 15 buildings were left vacant for periods between 2 and 14 years. Another three buildings were partially occupied for periods between 8 and 11 years. The vacant areas in these 18 buildings formed 28.4 per cent of the gross floor area of all the 41 buildings.

AGO also noted that 112,294 m or 78.0 per cent of the site was vacant land. AGO also observed during its site visit that some of the vacant buildings were poorly maintained. For example, there were termites in one building and condemned furniture and other discarded items in other buildings, which could pose pest and fire hazard problems.

And at the Ministry of Social and Family Development, the AGO found serious lapses in the National Council of Social Service which repeatedly violated procurement procedures such as by not getting the mandatory three quotes and although NCSS implemented a set of improved procedures in April 2013, the procedures did not prohibit the same officer from being both the payment approving authority and the quotation approving authority.

NCSS procedures were also lacking in requirements for ensuring proper negotiations, such as having ample representation during the negotiations and keeping proper records of the negotiation meetings. AGO’s test checks of 45 purchases made directly from the vendors or where only one or a few selected vendors were invited to bid revealed that for 32 purchases (71.1 per cent) totalling $1.72 million, NCSS gave lame reasons for not procuring through open competition.

AGO also found that for 15 of these 32 cases at NCSS, the suppliers were awarded the contracts without competition for three or more consecutive years, and for one case, for 20 years.

Over at the Ministry of Home Affairs, the AGO’s test checks of 46 payments at the Singapore Civil Defence Force(SCDF) revealed lapses in financial control and instances where officers had approved purchases and contracts or certified invoices when they did not have the authority to do so.

Specifically, the SCDF approved two payments in March 2012 amounting to $217,100 for the maintenance of two IT systems before services were fully performed.

There are many more such appalling lapses where proper procedures were blatantly ignored, money was lost and public resources had been wasted.  One need only read the contents page in the report to see the scale of the transgressions by the government bodies.

All these are matters involving public funds, trust and integrity and the Government must account to the people for the lapses and explain why some of these lapses have continued to recur despite them having been flagged by the AGO previously.

My point here is that there are many national issues of great importance and the MPs, who are elected and paid by the people to do a proper job, should not waste precious Parliament time fixated on slanderous attacks to fix opposition parties.

Read the full report by the AGO here http://www.ago.gov.sg/doc/ar-1314.pdf

The contents summary of AGO’s report:

10
MINISTRY OF DEFENCE
Lapses in the Licensing of Land
………………………………………………..
11
Lapses in Administration and Maintenance of Land
…………………….
13
MINISTRY OF EDUCATION
Control Weaknesses in Processing of Housing Allowance Payments
….
14
Late or Non-recovery of Salaries and Related Costs of Seconded Staff
……
15
Lapses in Tender Evaluation and Contract Management
………………
16
MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS
Contracts Made Outside Singapore Not Signed by Authorised
Signatories
………………………………………………………………………….
18
MINISTRY OF HEALTH
Financial Assistance Not Ceased for Deceased Persons
……………….
19
MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS
Singapore Civil Defence Force
Lapses in Controls over Financial Commitments and Payments
……
19
Misuse of Funds Stored in Cash Cards
……………………………………….
20
Prior Approval Not Sought for Changes in Procurement Requirements

21
ii
ii
PART II : AUDIT OF STATUTORY BOARDS
…………………………..
23
MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION
Media Development Authority
Lapses in Administration of Grants
……………………………………………
25
Lapses in Evaluation of Projects for Funding
……………………………..
27
National Library Board
Lapses in Procurement of Library Materials
……………………………….
27
MINISTRY OF CULTURE, COMMUNITY AND YOUTH
National Heritage Board
Irregularities in Management of Variation Works
……………………………
29
MINISTRY OF EDUCATION
Singapore Examinations and Assessment Board
Lapses in Appointment and Monitoring of Former Staff Engaged
for Projects
………………………………………………………………………….
31
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore
Lapses in Administration of Goods and Services Tax Refunds
under Tourist Refund Scheme
……………………………………………….
33
Singapore Totalisator Board
Gaps in Controls over Administration of Social Enterprise Hub
Programme
…………………………………………………………………………
34
iii
MINISTRY OF HEALTH
Health Sciences Authority
Lax Control over Approval of Applications for Import of
Medicinal Products
………………………………………………………………
36
Weak Controls over Seized Items
………………………………………………
37
Contracts Awarded to Incumbent Contractors that Did Not
Meet Tender Requirements
……………………………………………………

39
MINISTRY OF MANPOWER
Central Provident Fund Board
Lapses in Managing Waiver of Competition, Purchases and
Approval of Ad Hoc Works
………………………………………………….
41
Wrong CPF Contributions for Employees Performing
Operationally Ready National Service
……………………………………
43
Lapses in Monitoring and Following Up of Erroneous Medisave
Claims
………………………………………………………………………………..
44
Incomplete Data for Assessing Eligibility for Workfare Income
Supplement Benefits
……………………………………………………………
45
MINISTRY OF NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority
Under-utilisation of Land, Buildings and Facilities
…………………………
46
Assets Under-utilised or Left Unused
………………………………………..
48
Weaknesses in Evaluation of Research Projects
…………………………..
49
National Parks Board
Creating and Backdating of Documents Furnished for Audit
………..
50
MINISTRY OF SOCIAL AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT
National Council of Social Service
Irregularities at Various Stages of Procurement
…………………………..
51
MINISTRY OF
THE ENVIRONMENT AND
WATER RESOURCES
National Environment Agency
Inadequate Follow-up on Possible Breaches of Tenancy Conditions
….
54
MINISTRY OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY
Standards, Productivity and Innovation Board
Lapses in Procurement of Services to Administer an Award

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Shared Posts, Socio political and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to 50 Shades of White, PAP-Govt’s House Needs Cleaning

  1. Sporebiz says:

    Read the AGO’s conclusion on AHPETC and those drawn by AGO on ministries and you will realise the severity. AHPETC’s is a cardinal sin as the Catholic Church says and the ministries venial sins. I do not always agree or support PAP but that does not mean my position is “what the PAP government does is wrong and whatever rascally acts done by opposition and other loud mouths in the cyberspace right.” BTW, I am a resident in AHPETC.

    • Dear resident of AHPETC, you have clearly missed the point of my article. No where did I claim that WP was right in what it did although there were certainly politicised circumstances such as not being able to get fearful vendors to bid for the TC services. My point was to question the out-of-proportion sensationalised lambasting of WP by the PAP MPs which took up much of precious Parliament time when time could have been better spent debating other issues of national concern. And the second point is to highlight how the ruling party has numerous transgressions relating to mismanagement and lapses as pointed out over the years by the AGO versus one lapse by the WP. We are not talking about one or two lapses but lapses across all the Ministries. And yet, we have not seen any meaningful discussion over these lapses in Parliament nor in the mainstream media.

      BTW, if you view what WP did as a cardinal sin, then the annual financial transgressions by the government bodies would make them unrepentant serial sinners which in my view is even worse. You may want to refresh on the AIM saga committed by the PAP which IMHO may be the original cardinal sin of town councils.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s