Speaking Up is Not Anti-Singapore

One People, One Nation

At a recent gathering with some Singaporean friends, the discussion inadvertently turned to local politics. But when I mentioned Mr Brown, our famous Singapore blogger, one of my friends asked: “Who??” And the punchline came when another friend answered:”Oh, I know! He’s that anti-Singapore blogger!”

I was flabbergasted and told her that Mr Brown (whom I do not know personally) may be many things including being a funny humorist, amateur actor and avid blogger but he is certainly not anti-Singapore. If anything, I think he has consistently come across as a pretty die-hard supporter of Singapore. So how on earth did she get this impression of him? Was it the video spoofs he did of the PAP MPs? Or was it his satirical jokes that failed to tickle her funny bone?

This incident reminded me of the common labels that are being dished out regularly by the more conservative Singaporeans (and even some PRs) to locals who dare openly question and criticise the Government and government policies. Often they use the labels “anti-government” and “anti-establishment” to dismiss whatever is being said as negative. As for the label “anti-Singapore” it implies a “you are with us or against us” metality.

How did such erroneous thinking and labelling come about? When did speaking up become akin to a treacherous deed against the country?? Is it because, for far too long, Singaporeans have been moulded and raised on a diet of out-of-bound markers, quiet obedience, self censorship and an apolitical attitude? Have all those lost years – post independence – of never blatantly questioning government policies and the ruling party turned many of us into a people who have lost the fire in our belly? Or worse, lost our ability to evaluate the facts, to think out-of-the-box and to judge fairly?

It flummoxes me when well-educated, intelligent people instantly pigeonhole Singaporeans as being anti-establishment as soon as they criticise or poke fun at the Government. In some ways, it is like the frog in a well. The frog thinks he knows what is best as he has been safe and well fed staying in the well all this time. He feels threatened by anyone who tries to talk to him about the New World and who shakes his comfort zone. Fair enough, he is entitled to his opinion.

But let’s get it straight once and for all – it is wrong to label people who speak up and question government policies and PAP as being “anti-establishment”, “anti-government” or “anti-Singapore”. Think about it, are the Republicans being anti-establishment when they criticise the Democrats in the US? Are the loyal supporters of Malaysia’s opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim being anti-Malaysia? Of course not! Regardless of their differences, they all love their country with a passion.

We all have different ways of showing love, be it to a loved one or to our country. Some are more reserved while some are more open and expressive and some are downright passionate. Just as we do not label those who don’t speak up as being anti-Singapore, we should not tar and feather vocal citizens who speak with a voice of reason as being anti-anything.

Think about it. It is precisely because we care that we bother to share our views and to speak up for our country. We speak up when we see wrong doings by politicians or policies working against the interest of our people. We speak up simply because we want to build a better homeland for our future.

In most democratic countries it is normal to hold different political views and to freely express them. Opinions are exchanged, ideas will occasionally clash and there will always be some extreme voices on the fringe. But out of this “noise” comes a maturing of the electorate, one that will care even more about what happens to their country. By having a say in our country, we gain pride and ownership and a real sense of belonging. That much desired thing called patriotism is an elusive fire that comes from within us and not because we sing national songs during National Day.

At the end of the day, we should all realise that we are just one people wanting the best for our country. There will be differences but there should be no enemies in the building of Singapore.

“My kind of loyalty was loyalty to one’s country, not to its institutions or its office-holders.” ~Mark Twain, 1889

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Socio political and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Speaking Up is Not Anti-Singapore

  1. Tony Seow says:

    I agreed with you…I can be anti-PAP for some of their high-handedness, but never anti-Singapore.

  2. Pingback: Daily SG: 12 Apr 2012 « The Singapore Daily

  3. I generally am quite supportive of the government’s policies myself, and I agree wholeheartedly with you that disagreement with them is absolutely not the same as a lack of patriotism. Just two quick points.

    1. However, I think we should be careful with the idea that the “free exchange of views” will necessarily lead to political maturity in the populace. They may be more politically active, or politically aware (as they are in the US) but maturity is another order of things altogether. But that would be quite a different discussion.

    2. You raise a point that “we do not label those who don’t speak up as being anti-Singapore”. But that is not true, depending on who the reader thinks “your” side is. For example, I would point you to the “Demon-cratic” series of cartoons by Chew13 – frequently reposted on Facebook – which go to the extent of mocking the 60% who voted for the PAP in the last elections as “gullible”, among many other insults. We should stand together against those who question your patriotism. I hope you feel a similar passion against extremists of the opposite variety.

    • Dictionary Democratic says:

      This blog is really on point. We wish to advocate for the truth. I don’t think we are anti singapore. We anti what is not right for Singaporean. Views maybe different but it surely is part of the maturing process of politics.

      We cannot be label as anti singapore when we questions the right of our government or the establishment for Singaporeans. How can it seems like we are betrayal of our country when we just want a better singapore by questioning debating and finding out the truth?

      As a saying goes Real Gold is not afraid of fire, it will still be gold under a different state. If it’s true and right what you do, why fear investigations?

      Coming together, solving together, real transparency together! Governance of the people for the people for we the people is the country, then I see real democracy.

  4. @bluelightningblue – Thanks for your comments. On your first point, I believe that the opening up of Singapore whereby people are starting to express their political views openly is good for our people and our country in the long run. There may be hiccups along the way as many of us are new to being “politicised” but this is part of the maturing process that we have to go through.

    On your second point, if you note my commentary is taking issue with 3 particular labels being slapped on the vocal Singaporeans who criticise policies and the government. My point is that no one should be accused of being anti-government, anti-establishment and definitely not anti-Singaporean whether we speak up or not as all these 3 labels implies being doing something bad against the country in some way.

    As for the other insults that you mentioned such as calling the “60%” gullible, do note the “40%” have also been called lots of adjectives including “lunatic fringe” by an MP. Personally, I can handle and even brush off these other adjectives as it is par for the course as we become a truer democracy and as people feel more passionately about their country and express their various political views more. This is something we have to learn to take in our stride and I doubt the name-calling will ever go away for good. But I will still maintain, call me liberal, call me the wild wild west whatever, but just never ever call me anti-establishement, anti-government and least of all anti-Singapore.

  5. Pingback: Cherian George: 10 things PAP did to prep for GE 2015 | Mothership.SG

  6. Pingback: Cynical Hats Off | molecularminds

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s