One Little Riot Opens Pandora’s Box to Many Big Issues

The riot involving a mob of over 400 foreign workers in Little India

The riot involving a mob of over 400 foreign workers in Little India

So much has been said about the Little India riot with blame implied by our Govt and unsubtly pinned on the supposed drunken fury of the workers. At this stage, the causes of the riot have not been officially defined nor has it been proven that the rioting was due to drunken states. Yes, the workers were wrong to have rioted but has our Govt ever considered that they are ultimately responsible in a way for failing to consider the infrastructural and sociology-psychological impact and consequences of shipping in 700,000 foreign workers (excluding domestic workers) onto a tiny island (just 710 sq m in size) to work in hard laborious jobs? Of these 700k, about 300,000 are South Asian blue collar workers.

When you have such a large number of lowly paid and over worked transient workers here, you must plan for them as human beings and not as mere digits to fulfill an economical need. Did the government work to ensure that their well-being and welfare is taken care of? Are these poor and powerless workers housed in decent lodgings, fed decent food, and given enough time to rest? Did our government plan for sufficient recreational outlets and facilities to cater to the workers’ interests and different needs? (sitting around and walking around Little India every single weekend as the main form of recreation can get frustrating even for a local so let’s get real here and view all the workers of different nationalities as people with genuine needs and feelings).

We all have different sets of experiences, values and customs. Some of us are more reserved, some of us are passionate and expressive. Some like to drink, and some hate drinking. Even among locals, we have many differences, what more with those of other nationalities?  The government’s declaration that foreigners have to live and behave the “Singapore Way” shows a complete ignorance of and a lack of empathy for human behavior and our individual needs. And it reflects this govt’s blinkered dictatorial mind – Do it our way or no way. Should they not consider the differences of our diverse population and learn how to manage and yet cater to the differences in a small melting pot?

The Govt wants the integration of these workers with our society but this is somewhat naive when dealing with transient workers who are here on short contracts. What integration are we talking about when some locals have even suggested building fences and gates to protect all public housing in Little India (will that be our new apartheid complete with signs saying “Foreign workers keep out”?). What integration when Housing Minister Khaw Boon Wan has even once suggested the possibility of housing foreign workers on outlying islands (a nicer version of Robbens Island with a curfew?).  What in the world are these people thinking of? Keeping the foreign workers out of the way is simply not right morally. Adaptation with minimal conflicts is a more realistic goal.

It is too late to put back the clock now with such a huge number of imported workers already here (and that’s not counting numerous others on other employment passes), hence the Government needs to get down to work fast to have a good grasp of the situation. Instead of just doing a technical Committee of Inquiry investigation of the riot, they need to do soul-searching and hold discussions with all relevant parties including transient workers groups. Instead of trying to put a quick ending to this riot, which must be mortifying to the Govt and is a huge slap to their proposed Population White Paper to jack up the population with more foreigners,  the G needs to do a holistic review of the foreign worker and population issues.

This riot is not something that can nor should be left to Home Affairs Ministry alone to analyse and handle.  The Manpower Ministry and community agencies across the government must come together and conduct proper research and thorough planning to ensure that the welfare and needs of these workers are met. There is also no better way to understand the situation, the frustrations and the needs by speaking to the workers themselves. Don’t interrogate them. Ask them what they think and feel. The answers may surprise.

Can ways be found to help these workers adapt? Can ways be found to give them better treatment? Can ways be found to provide them with more avenues for relaxation and recreation? Can ways be found to help Singaporeans understand and adapt to them better?  Can the government review and scale back the population targets and numerous construction projects to balance the influx of workers with the small size of our nation and needs of the local population? Can our government even begin to reflect honestly and ask themselves what went wrong and what can be done better for the foreign workers and for the citizens of the country?

Things often happen for a reason in life. This unfortunate riot has a silver lining in that it has opened a Pandora’s Box and reminded us that there are many deeper issues that must be examined and answered. Dealing with these underlying issues and treating people decently will be the necessary first step to having long-term harmony among vested parties on our little island country.

About these ads
This entry was posted in Shared Posts, Socio political and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to One Little Riot Opens Pandora’s Box to Many Big Issues

  1. Why Why Why says:

    I will not call it the Little India Riot. Instead I will use the following language to expose the underlaying factors which the government refuses to accept.

    The PRC workers strike (SMART, Panosonic Sit-Out, Crane Driver etc)
    The India Workers Riot (little India)

    Soon to come:
    The Bangadesh Workers …………..
    The Thai Workers …………………..
    The Filipino Workers ……………….

  2. nelsonmandala says:

    foreign workers ALL over the world will hav a boilin point on their foreheads
    lacked of sex also frustrated in their minds as a normal humane being
    imagined this scenerio..
    b4 u arrived..u had the american dream of california where golds are paved in tanglin road
    where u juz placed yr hands on a wall and money wud pop out liked a poker cards….
    butt sadly in singapoor realive scenerio is so much different
    where the livin space is worst that a petdog and many wud not see their 1st earnin draw in ca$h for the next 9 months or so…
    last butt not least most of these workers r made to work more longer than anybody else..
    ow many foreign workers really worked on a 44 hours week?

  3. George says:

    The only way to describe the culpability of the govt in this and many other areas, including those that affect Singaporeans directly: WILLFUL BLINDNESS.
    The govt attitude and approach is very much like that of the colonial masters of the past towards the early migrants who became our pioneering forefathers – leaving it entirely to the own devices of the migrants to survive and live and take care of themselves. But the colonial masters at least had a valid ‘excuse’ which was that Singapore then was a mosquito infested, undeveloped swamp land. We are supposedly a first world country now with among the best infrastructures in the world. There is absolutely no excuse for the way and manner that foreign workers brought in to tackle the most physically demanding, menial and tough jobs are being treated and exploited.

    • Agree with you on the wilful blindness. But correction – Singapore was not a swampy wasteland during British rule. Our country was already a thriving trading hub by the 14th century and it was precisely because the Brits saw the success and potential that they colonised this island and they helped to modernise the place by putting in more infrastructure and administrative and civil service systems. Much of Singapore’s success can be attributed to the strong foundation of our history long before PAP became the govt and LKY started claiming unjustified credit as founder of Singapore.

      • mat says:

        True, British colonialists saw the potential of the Singapore Island… But you are confusing with Malacca, which indeed was the biggest trading hub in the world during the 15th century…

        From Wikipedia:
        “The earliest known settlement on Singapore was in the second century AD. It was an outpost of the Sumatran Srivijaya empire, named Temasek (‘sea town’). Between the 16th and early 19th centuries, it was part of the Johor Sultanate. In 1613, Portuguese raiders burnt down the settlement and the island sank into obscurity for the next two centuries [...] Before Raffles arrived, there were around 1,000 people living in Singapore”

      • Mat – perhaps you should read a more credible source on Singapore’s history by a NUS archaelogist who wrote a book about the history ““Singapore and the The Silk Road of the Sea”, a splendid new book by John Miksic, an archaeologist at the National University of Singapore, reveals…. Singapore was also a thriving, populous city in the 14th century.” http://www.economist.com/blogs/banyan/2013/11/14th-century-singapore

      • matieux says:

        Thanks for the link… Always appreciate to diversify my sources of information

  4. Pingback: VIDEOS: Singapore’s First Riot in 40 Years · Global Voices

  5. Dear Sir,

    Relying on cheap labour may be a decision at first, but it gradually grows to an addition which will consume us before we realise it. Unfortunately, compassion these days comes with a price tag which the government will never pay. Or rather, unable to pay at the current state of our mindset.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s