Elections in Singapore: PAP's Strategy Uncovered

Reblogged from The Heart Truths:

Click to visit the original post

  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post

In this article, I will attempt to outline the strategies used by the People's Action Party (PAP) to ensure that they are kept in power, and the systematic strategies that they use to enact barriers to competition for the other political parties.

This article can be read in four parts.

  1. In the first part, I will look at the general election trends in Singapore to understand them. 

Read more… 8,297 more words

Jentrified Citizen - This is too good not to share. A comprehensive look at our political history and how the PAP used all means and ways to make it harder and harder for alternative parties to contest and win elections.
Posted in Shared Posts | Leave a comment

Indranee's curious claims

Reblogged from Andrew Loh:

Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post

“Senior Minister of State for Education Indranee Rajah said the priority system for children going through Primary One registration is not linked to the government.”TODAY, 13 May 2013.

The Senior Minister was responding to a suggestion by Non-constituency Member of Parliament (NCMP), Lina Chiam, to abolish the primary school registration priority scheme for community leaders which she says is linked with the government.

Read more… 934 more words

Jentrified Citizen - Why do some politicians lie to the citizens and think they can get away with it when the truth is so blatantly obvious and the writing is on the wall? How much longer do they think they can keep lying before the bubble bursts? It would be so much better for them and the people if they spent their time fixing the warped political system rather than fixing the opposition.
Posted in Shared Posts | 8 Comments

In Singapore We’ve Forgotten: I Think That I Am Better Than You (Part 2)

Reblogged from The Heart Truths:

This is a two-part article to understand the real problem facing Singapore now and how we can overcome it. Part 1 of this article can be found here.

In Singapore, Where Is Our Soul?

As Singapore grew, we learnt to made functional things. We had converted our rivers into drains, but now we are converting them back into rivers. We’ve learnt to construct manicured gardens but now we are starting to realise that perhaps, we need to leave our greenery natural.

Read more… 1,590 more words

Jentrified Citizen - a timely thoughtful essay by HeartTruth blogger. Yes, in our hurry to be successful, have we forgotten the important things in life such as appreciating education for helping us learn and develop into better beings rather than just seeing it as a means to a job? Our government, ministers, MPs and all of us need to relearn the meaning of life. It goes beyond the 4Cs, beyond GDP and certainly beyond building inconic artifice like the Gardens by the Bay for miillions of dollars. A simpler life can often be a richer life.
Posted in Shared Posts | 1 Comment

PM Lee and Lim Swee Say: Revealing the Truth With Real Statistics

Reblogged from The Heart Truths:

Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and Minister without any portfolio Lim Swee Say made some bold claims on May Day this year. (The real reason for not having a named portfolio is because it would be ironic to have a Minister for Unions, wouldn't it? The government shouldn't be interfering in union affairs, rightfully!)

A look at the statistics will bulldoze their claims.

Read more… 2,854 more words

Jentrified Citizen - Everyone should share this execellent factual analysis. The facts speak for themselves on why so many things are wrong with Singapore and why we are so unhappy. The facts debunk the myths and spin that have been painted by our government on how well they have been taking care of us. Not! They have been growing Singapore Inc as a business and their own fat salaries, yes. But taking good care of each and every Singaporean? Let the facts speak out loud.
Posted in Shared Posts | Leave a comment

Oppression and threats will not destroy our spirit

If you find it suffocating lately, it may not be the haze but quite likely it is due to the oppressive tactics by our government to suppress views that are critical of them and their policies. oppression-11

I had been hopeful that the PAP-led government would change for the better when I first started my blog post GE 2011. Unfortunately, those upbeat sentiments went downhill fast after watching the words and actions by the ministers over the past 2 years. To be fair, there were some positive changes, such as the review of ministerial salaries (lower but still the world’s highest) and various attempts made by the government to engage the citizens more such as through the National Conversation (which has been subjected to both praise and scorn).

However, such improvements get overshadowed whenever the Government issues threatening lawyers letters , exercises heavy use of the law and carries out other unsavoury actions to muzzle vocal activists.  The latest sagas that have left a foul-smelling trail involve the pressure tactics on activist Nizam Ismail for having spoken up publicly on national concerns when he was still involved with the Association of Muslim Professionals (AMP). His punishment? Threats were allegedly made (by two Ministers no less) to cut off funding to AMP where he was a director. Nizam has  resigned from AMP and has documented the saga on his blog.

And a week ago, cartoonist Leslie Chew was arrested for allegedly being seditious in two of his cartoons from his satirical cartoon series Demon-cratic. Both incidents involving Leslie and Nizam caused an uproar among many concerned Singaporeans who care about fairness and justice. Like them, I am upset because of the hypocrisy and double standards that exist in Singapore.

Adding to this storm of injustices, Minister Tan Chuan-Jin made a brow-raising comment on his Facebook page recently over the vandalism incident where the word “Democracy” was spray painted in red on a war memorial. Before even knowing who the culprit was, which could have been a mischievous youth, Chuan Jin expressed his anger and implied “Anarchy” from this ONE single graffiti! His exact words were: The vandals sprayed “Democracy”. Sorry. Wrong spelling. Was it “Anarchy” they were looking for?”.

Vandalism no doubt it was, but anarchy?? Was he trying to stir anger against anyone who talks, writes and paints the word democracy? Was he trying to turn the public against activists without even knowing who the culprit was? And even if the culprit were an activist, where’s the link between this one-off graffiti and anarchy? Does Chuan-Jin know the meaning of the word? Anarchy as defined by Merriam-Webster means “a state of lawlessness or political disorder due to the absence of governmental authority.” That surely doesn’t apply to Singapore which, as the entire world knows,  has too much government control and exceptionally stringent laws.

As I have always said, PAP needs to stop being hyper hypocritical and reflect on its own ugly behaviour before it  shouts, threatens and accuses its critics.

The biggest culprit guilty of manipulative partisan politics is them. Look no further than the entire public-funded People’s Association which is supposed to be non-partisan and yet is clearly there to support the PAP’s agenda; and look deeper at the entire network of GLCs and TLCs and the vast NTUC empire. Now, can they look us in the eye and tell us that they are  non-partisan?

And what about the case of Malminderjit Singh, president of the Young Sikh Association (YSA)?  Like the AMP, the YSA also receives funding from the Government and yet, as blogger Andrew Loh pointed out, Mr Singh is a PAP member and is Chairman of the council of PAP’s Policy Forum. Isn’t PAP practising partisanship in this case? Is partisanship ok so long as one is with Them and not critical of them?

Clearly PAP is the ultimate master puppeteer when it comes to wayang. Their actions sometimes make many wonder, is our government on our side to help and protect us or to control us in whatever ways and means?  Do they not know that if they continue this way, they are being divisive in splitting this nation into a Them vs Us?  They are the direct cause of the resentment and anger that has been building up among Singaporeans.

And do they not know that continued oppression of the people’s views through threats and use of laws that they created will not destroy our spirit but make it stronger? We are in a different era now where people are wising up as we have access to unprecedented diverse information thanks to the Internet and thanks to better education and a more vocal populace. With more sources of information and stronger critical thinking skills, we are in a better position to sieve out the lies and discern the truth. Knowing the truth strengthens our resolve to do what is right.

Our Government seriously needs to wake up and realise this. The people are not blind and are no longer agreeable to closing our eyes and being manipulated by lies and spin, nor are we easily threatened. Using reason, showing respect for the citizens and behaving ethically would go much further in getting our respect and trust.

As a citizen,  I truly hope that our government will wise up soon and start behaving with some dignity and principles befitting leaders of a democratic nation. Are they capable of doing this for the sake of our country’s peace and future?  I do not have the answer. For now, I can only hope and keep speaking up.

Disclaimer: I do not know Nizam nor Leslie. This is a non-partisan commentary.

Posted in Shared Posts, Socio political | Tagged , , , | 6 Comments

Double Standards In Singapore: Only The Government Can Win

Reblogged from The Heart Truths:

Click to visit the original post

Do you remember when Member of Parliament (MP) Seng Han Thong who in December 2011 had been asked about the SMRT train breakdowns that he had remarked, "I noticed that the PR mentioned that some of the staff because they are Malay, they are Indian, they can't converse in English good, well enough, so that also deters them, from (sic) but I think we accept broken English."?

Read more… 2,217 more words

Jentrified Citizen - I agree with HeartTruths' excellent analysis. The unethical acts of biasness and partisanship by our government are becoming so blatant that it is insulting to the people. The elites cannot be above the rule of law and must be held accountable when necessary (Whatever happened to the AIM's investigation for starters?). Our government really needs a sharp wakeup call to let them know that trust and respect has to be earned. We want exemplary leaders who walk the talk to lead our country, leaders we can truly respect and not hypocritical men and women who are motivated mainly by high pay and preserving their power base.
Posted in Shared Posts | Leave a comment

Who says our kids can’t learn dialects and multi-languages at the same time?

Are our kids incapable of learning dialects and Mandarin at the same time? Our government thinks so. Education Minister Heng Swee Kiat said recently at a dialogue session that learning “dialects will burden school kids more” which makes it clear that the authorities will not be encouraging our kids to learn dialects any time soon. His rationale for this is because he wants to ensure that our Singapore children have a sound grasp of English and the mother-tongue language. He also said it is best for the kids to learn dialects later on in life if they wish.

The government’s stand on dialects is built on fallacies that must be demolished.  Firstly, they are assuming that Singaporeans are unable to handle anything more than two languages competently. This is a fallacy. I have witnessed numerous older generations of Singaporeans, who grew up in the early 1900′s through to the 50s, 60′s and 70′s, who are able to speak not one but a few dialects, some Malay and reasonably good English and Mandarin.  My entire family including my elderly aunts and uncles are multi-lingual. Personally, I can speak three dialects and am fluent in English and Mandarin.

So unless Singaporeans have grown more stupid over the years, I do not see why the kids of today can’t learn dialects too. In fact, ain’t the kids getting smarter through the years with better education, nutrition and early learning opportunities?  And isn’t our education system better and more advanced now in its pedagogy and teaching of languages?

Back in the late 1970s, the government started doing away with dialects because there was a significant number of Singaporeans who did not master Mandarin and they promptly blamed this on the use of dialects. Henceforth, dialects were banned from TV and radio programmes and launched the Speak Mandarin campaign. This effectively killed the interest of Chinese youths in learning and the interest of parents in teaching dialects as all focused on Mandarin.  What I want to know is, why didn’t the government blame it on poor teaching methods instead of on dialects? Was there any factual proof to show that it was solely the direct result of speaking dialects that caused the poor mastery of Mandarin? If there wasn’t, shouldn’t they substantiate their stance against kids learning dialects? Are there other unmentionable political reasons for doing away with dialects?

We are in 2013 now not 1970s. It is time to stop politicising dialects and dissuading Singaporeans from learning them.

Mr Heng also said: “I don’t think you want a system where we get our kids to start learning in an even more complicated language environment. As it is, our language environment is already very complex.”  This statement is based on the fallacy that kids cannot handle too many languages, or in our case more than two – English and Mother tongue.  I am surprised that an education minister can say this as it is widely documented that kids, from the time they are babies, have the innate ability to pick up sounds, verbal codes and multiple languages. A study done in 2012 by an NUS prof showed that infants as young as 18-30 months were able to coordinate different sets of rules in learning languages. Childhood is actually the best time for kids to pick up languages and dialects naturally. Many studies have also demonstrated the learning of multiple languages benefits not only a student’s linguistic abilities but also their cognitive and creative abilities as well.

And let’s get this right, it is the entire education system here that has become complicated and not the learning of languages. Overhaul the education system to make it less stressful for kids and parents yes but do not drag dialects into the picture. Dialects are not taught at schools but taught at home. I picked up dialects from speaking with my family and friends and from watching dialect programmes.

Mr Heng also made a remark that in Shanghai they are also facing a loss of in the use of their dialect to try and defend his stance. True, while dialects are being used less frequently in China thanks to the more pervasive use of Mandarin, dialects are still thriving there as the people take great pride in speaking them. This is unlike Singapore where dialects have been denigrated as a hindrance (if not downright useless) by our government. Here, dialects are in danger of being wiped out in another generation if our country’s leaders steadfastly refuse to do anything to reverse the situation. Is this what they really want?

In Europe, many people there can speak multi-languages too. The Europeans are known for their ability to speak various languages, be it German, Spanish, French, etc. in addition to English. So why can’t Singaporeans be encouraged to be similarly enabled?

I love the use of dialects for the colour, richness and diversity and for the intimacy in bonding I get when I use it with my family, friends, at the kopi-tiam, with the elderly, with the aunties and uncles. I love the extra warm treatment and that invisible connection I feel when I speak Cantonese to people in Hong Kong and when I speak Hokkien in Taiwan. Dialects have deep roots for the Chinese.  It is a cultural heritage and an indelible part of our history that should be preserved.

Ironically, few of the young know that dialects are, historically, our original mother tongue (though our ministers and anglicised LKY may disagree).  It is also interesting to note that Mandarin is based on the phonological system of dialects in and around Beijing and many words and expressions are derived from various dialects in other districts. As a Chinese research author wrote in a paper supporting dialects: “Without dialects, Mandarin would no longer exist and can never be developed”.

Recently, I was encouraged when I read a commentary by an NTU student Jeraldine Phneah who lamented the loss of dialects. She said it was necessary to learn it to build better ties between the youths and the elderly including with grandparents who speak dialects. It will also help in a society with a fast aging population to prevent the elderly from feeling isolated. Jeraldine also started an online petition to ask the government to consider allowing dialects on local broadcast stations. Do sign it if you support this cause  http://www.thepetitionsite.com/312/814/814/support-the-reintroduction-of-dialects-on-local-tvradio-programs/

On the point about isolation of the elderly, let me share a personal anecdote. At a recent family dinner, the entire conversation among four generations was conducted in English as my nieces and nephews could not speak any dialect. My mum and granduncle sat quietly in a corner trying not to look forlorn. It was obvious that they felt left out as they would occasionally ask timidly in dialect:”What did they say?”. The disconnect between the young and older dialect speaking generations is obvious. We are greeted by blank faces even when we use common dialect words in jokes. And I have heard youths mispronouncing “chope” as chop!

As our government has declared that they are willing to listen to Singaporeans’ views in this  less dictatorial era, I truly hope that they will hear us well on this matter of dialects. Dialects are an important part of our roots and a big part of our Singapore history from the time of the early migrants from Asia centuries ago. Mai hum (no cockles) and kopi siew dai are still part of our daily lingo here when we order food and drinks. Many dialect words have evolved to become part of our Singlish. “I chope this place” is our quintessential way of saying we reserve something be it a table or a seat for example. There is so much value and fun in using dialects, for those of us who know it.

The need to do something proactive to protect and promote the learning of dialects is made all the more compelling by the incessant influx of foreigners and new immigrants who will bring with them their own languages and which will further dilute the use of dialects.

In our nation’s search for our Singapore identity, I urge the government to have a serious rethink on dialects even as they continue to promote the mastery of English and Mandarin. Please do not eliminate our dialect roots at the expense of pursuing an economic goal but help us to preserve our cultural heritage. Surely, a capable government can think of creative ways to help Singaporeans master key languages and yet nurture the speaking of dialects? One doesn’t have to thrive at the demise of another.  It would be a sad and tragic day if dialects were to disappear from Singapore. Kee Chiu if you agree.

Posted in Shared Posts, Society, Socio political | Tagged , , | 11 Comments

Mahbubani on "What is governance?"

Reblogged from The GOVERNANCE blog:

Click to visit the original post

Kishore Mahbubani, Dean of the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy at the National University of Singapore, responds to Francis Fukuyama’s “What is governance?”:

Francis Fukuyama has done the West an enormous favor with his essay on “What is governance?” He is subtly introducing a distinction between democracy and good governance, a distinction which is almost inconceivable in Western minds.

Read more… 604 more words

Jentrified Citizen - Read what Kishore Mahnubani has to say about democracy vis-a-vis governance. He lauds and holds China as a fine example of "good governance" without democracy, and he continues to put down the "Western minds" which he believes cannot think beyond "black and white". First he gushes over how China has shown it is possible to have good governance without democracy. Disturbingly, his idea of good governance appears to exclude caring for the human soul (well-being) and human rights as he speaks largely of the wealth of capital and knowledge. It is also troubling that he thinks governance can be great and ethical when the decisions are made by an absolute power without checks and balances. In his commentary, Kishore also proceeds to contradict himself by adding post-script almost, lest he sounds undemocratic, that he thinks "democracy is a desirable goal". Generalisations and contradictions abound in his writings. As The Economist once said in a review of a book he wrote...Kishore "makes argument by non sequitur" and his arguments are sloppy and disparate. Indeed, some of his key points in this commentary are not substantiated but steeped in unsubtle prejudices. Why am I even blogging about him? Because he is supposedly an intellectual and is the Dean of LKY School of Public Policy at NUS. And because he now has a weekly column (entire page) in the Straits Times to try and persuade Singaporeans to see things the way of the great white spinners. He would be a dangerous writer if his reasoning weren't so flawed and inelegant. PS: Watch him speak in a TV interview with BBC Hardtalk ...and check out that helmet hairdo ala President Tony Tan! It's uncanny how both men share some similarities in their pompous speaking style in addition to the backcomb.
Posted in Musing Out Loud, Shared Posts | Tagged , | 6 Comments

Xenophobia? Clean up your own act before making accusations

With the Singapore court defending the retention of 377A which criminalises sex between homosexuals, I just want to tell our government this…

a. Stop being homophobes.

b. Stop being racist in some of your national policies (you know which races you have been discriminating against).

c. Stop being bloody elitist in the way you govern starting with the warped education system to the extremely snobbish mindset among the rich and powerful elites (who can forget the brash youth who once said “Get out of my elitist uncaring face”?).

d. Stop looking down on Singaporeans (it shows in the way you wayang, the patronising way you speak to and about us, and the arrogant way you micromanage us from the draconian laws to the tight-fisted control of our CPF money).

If our government can do all of the above, then, maybe then, we will take them seriously when they preach morals and values. Until, then, please don’t try to lob false accusations at patriotic Singaporeans and claim we are xenophobic for trying to defend our rights.

And stop those laughable fallacious arguments which are full of holes. Face it that what we are witnessing is NOT just a “vocal minority”  who are speaking up against bad policies but a significant, if not, majority of Singaporeans who care about the future of our homeland.

As for xenophobes, get real. There are always some of these extremists lurking around in society in every country even though it is condemnable. It is right to condemn such behaviour but it is wrong of our government and mainstream media  to go round screaming “xenophobia” at  every vocal Singaporean who speaks up. The question is – why are we, from youths to elderly, so upset now when we have been accepting of and welcoming to immigrants, expats and numerous foreigners living and working here over the decades?

The hard truth is, while we are not against foreigners, we are troubled by the disproportionately high percentage of non-Singaporeans  in our country (at 40% now and rising to about 50% by 2030).  This sort of  percentage is not normal in any country that cares about its people, nationhood and identity. Indeed, it would be abnormal if no one spoke up and questioned the lax immigration policies and their critical impact on our lives, our jobs and our home.

So please, cease insulting loyal citizens with the misplaced and false allegation of xenophobia. And clean up your own backyard first before acting all righteous and virtuous.

Posted in Socio political | Tagged , , | 4 Comments

Singaporeans Happiest in Asia? How about Richest and Most Well-fed too?

Screenshot of Yahoo's headline. Note how they used a pix of unhappy looking commuters to contrast with the headline. Naughty, naughty.

Screenshot of Yahoo’s headline. Note how they used a pix of unhappy looking commuters to contrast with the headline. Naughty, naughty.

I have seen a lot of bullshit surveys but the recent one claiming Singaporeans are the Happiest in Asia takes the cake for being the one with the biggest BS and a methodology that is laughable.

Eden Strategy Institute (ESI) made a flawed claim that Singaporeans are the Happiest in Asia using a survey based on what people are saying on social media. The survey tracked the use of predetermined words by users of social media such as Facebook, Twitter, blogs and online forums over a short period. The list of words includes “thank you”, “the best”, “grateful”, “hopeful” and “positive”.  ESI calculated the Happiness Index score by taking into account the social media population in each country and the number of of hits generated by a search engine when their researchers key in the predetermined words.”

Essentially, this survey was done without interviewing anyone for their views on whether they are happy or unhappy.

Using this dubious methodology, we can make many other claims I reckon – track how many times Singaporeans mention the words money, cars, housing online (which is damn often) and we may also be able to assert that Singaporeans are the Richest People in Asia! Or how about track the number of times Singaporeans mention food, food names and food locations (which again, is very often if not 3x daily) and we can claim Singaporeans are the Greediest in Asia or Singaporeans are the most Well-fed in Asia!

Wow, I didn’t know doing surveys has become so easy nowadays. No need to call/email anyone or conduct face-to-face interviews to draw conclusions about how people feel or think anymore! Just pay social media agencies like ESI to track what’s being said on social media! Easy peasy.

One also wonders how ESI came to the conclusion we are the happiest in Asia when their survey only covered five countries, namely Singapore and the other less developed countries Malaysia, the Philippines, India and Indonesia.  Whatever happened to prosperous China, zen Japan and the happening land of K-pop?

The real joke was when one of ESI directors was asked by TODAY as to how this survey gels with previous ones, such as the Gallup poll and he said his company’s survey was “more scientific” and “looks at the drivers of happiness on a much wider population”. ESI’ press release on this even claims it has created the “first scientifically-driven, independent and objective Happiness Index…”.

Scientific my foot. How is this survey more scientific than Gallup Poll which had done a survey showing Singaporeans to be the Unhappiest in Asia? ESI’s survey covered highly skewed demographics ie only social media users which tends to be younger and more tech savvy and it did not ask the opinion of a single Singaporean, let alone a living being. The Gallup poll in contrast did its survey that measured positive emotions in 148 countries compared to the incomplete set of 5 Asian countries by ESI. Plus Gallup actually asked people for their views via telephone or in-person interviews. This doesn’t mean that Gallup’s poll was flawless, but at least they attempted to do it properly.

For those who want to know more facts debunking this ESI survey, you can also read the detailed analysis done by blogger The Heart Truths.

I am curious as to why ESI did this survey. Was it prompted by someone in authority to do a survey to  counter the Gallup Poll findings? Or were they seeking a fast way of promoting their company? It’s pure conjecture of course but still, they certainly achieved fame (or infamy) for coming up with a claim that is the total opposite of what Gallup claimed, and which paints a completely different picture from all the angst and unhappiness expressed by Singaporeans over the past couple of years.

It’s interesting to note that several of the things they said in their press release on the findings were stereotypical generalities. And some of the stuff they said sounded suspiciously like political spiel which we have heard before from a certain party. On Singaporeans, ESI said: “Singapore tops the list (of Happiest nations) despite a looming perception of dissatisfaction over rising costs of living, recent infrastructure breakdowns, and the style of governance in the mass media. Any such negative sentiment appears to be voiced by a vocal minority, while the majority of Singaporeans continue to build on the Singaporean dream of self-actualisation, meritocracy, safety, and efficiency in society.”

It is funny that that ESI does not see the rich irony of the words they use in describing unhappy Singaporeans as “vocal minority” a term often used by the PAP- run government to refer to and dismiss its critics as being limited mainly to netizens. If the vocal minority = online commentators, how then can ESI assume that those netizens they tracked in this survey represent all Singaporeans? And with foreigners making up some 40% of our population currently, did they discount that large chunk from their calculations? But how can they even tell who is a local and who is not from tracking social media key words? DUH!

What I cannot understand is why our mainstream media including Yahoo News did not question ESI on the obvious weaknesses in its survey methodology. Instead, they reported the news according to what the company claimed. Where was their journalistic responsibility and don’t they do quality control before reporting such flawed findings to their readers?

It is really quite surprising that after all that has been said and done there are still supposedly intelligent people out there who think Singaporeans are dumb enough to swallow unsubstantiated spin and BS.  Perhaps they should conduct a survey to check just how daft or sharp Singaporeans really are before they make further flawed assumptions and an ass of themselves.

PS: this commentary doesn’t mean Singaporeans ain’t happy people as some might be wont to conclude. We may be, and I hope we are, but it takes more than a half-baked survey to prove that we are or we are not the happiest in Asia.

Posted in Shared Posts, Society | Tagged , , | 10 Comments